We can get certitude from random events, (B) is simply, not more, not less common sense, I dare. I feel that (B) cannot anyway to be assimilated to a Syllogism. The conclusion 3(A) is completely senseless. In my opinion (A) is invalid because one condition to fulfil to be a member is precisely to be an American citizen. _Then H0 is probably not true and therefore formally invalid. _If H0 is true then the result (statistical significance) will probably not occur, put in confront with the following basic clauses “validating” the NHST,Ĭonclusion: J.B. The conclusion is risible, of course, so J. _3(A)- Therefore, he is probably not an American. _2(A)- This person is a member of the Congress, _1(A)- If a person is an American, then is probably not a member of the Congress, Let be the Jacob Cohen “The Earth is Round (p<0.05)” specifically of a syllogism the author found (Pollard, Richardson, 1987). When a person gets old tends to turns out his beliefs to certainty, I dread.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |